Saturday
Jun092012

Texting while driving is for amateurs

July 28, 2009

 

Really? People can’t drive a car while text-messaging, because it’s distracting, and it might be as dangerous as driving drunk?

I don’t buy it. First, because I’ve driven drunk, years ago, in my reckless and stupid youth, and I don’t remember being able to be sober most of the ride home, and then decide to only be drunk at stoplights. 

Yeah, I text while I drive. At stoplights, and when I’m stuck in traffic, and when I’m sitting in a parking spot. I will occasionally look at a text while I drive.

But honestly, as anyone with kids will tell you, texting is NOT the problem. You know what is?

  1. BulletTrying to retrieve a baby’s pacifier from the back seat floor, two inches beyond your grasp, while said baby screams and gasps for air because he’s so mad he lost the damned thing.

  2. BulletBaby seats that face backward, forcing you to be a contortionist while you drive to make sure the baby’s breathing/hasn’t choked/still has said pacifier/is asleep.

  3. BulletDVD players that are set up three inches beyond your grasp in the back seat, forcing you to eject/retrieve/insert a movie while doing above said contortions, while mediating a fight about which movie it will be and finding the DVD holder and cleaning off the smudges from the movie. Then the movie’s got scratches, and it won’t work, and you need to repeat above, still negotiating which movie will be played.

  4. BulletHanding out drinks and fries while moving, then opening ketchup with your teeth, handing it all the way back, and then collecting the garbage (and DON’T TELL ME you haven’t done this if you have kids in the back seat....)

  5. BulletTrying to call the doctor on the way to the ER while your toddler is in the back wailing and either barfing, bleeding or bent over in pain, while your husband yells at the other assorted children in the car.

  6. BulletMaking out with a new boyfriend while driving. It’s been awhile, but let me tell you, it’s WAY more of a challenge than a text message. And don’t tell me you’ve never done that, either.

  7. BulletEating a hamburger, holding a drink and answering the phone. Judging from the freeways, everyone does this.

  8. BulletFighting with your husband over the latest phone bill/electric bill/issue-that-you’re-fighting-about-that-month. It’s way more stressful than sending a text, and believe me, if you can’t remember the drive home because you were too busy defending your point, you weren’t paying attention to the road.

  9. BulletCats, dogs or guinea pigs in the car. Or a new box of chickens from the store. Or a rooster who won’t stop crowing.

  10. BulletDriving cross-country when you have the flu with an autistic toddler in the back who nurses every two hours and has a complete terror of the dark.

Texting? It’s at the bottom of my list.

Do I do it? Not really. Once in a while. Mostly at stoplights.

But if you’re going to outlaw texting, then rear-facing carseats, kids, husbands, handjobs and French fries while driving have to be outlawed, too.

That ought to make the roads a little safer.

Saturday
Jun092012

Gluten. Apraxia. Autism. All in one study 

Published July 23, 2009


Wow. I'm not crazy. And neither, apparently, are those other motheres.

You know, the ones with celiac disease, who took my gluten-free cooking classes, hoping to cook for their autistic kids. Three and four mothers in a class at once, all with celiac disease and autistic kids, all of whom were told there’s no connection between the two.

I’m not sure whether this study is a good one. I don’t know anything about it.

I do know that when I saw the words “apraxia, gluten, celiac, children” and “autism” all in one study, I started crying.

Sander’s only four. Two years ago, he had autism and apraxia. And I was told gluten didn’t cause it, and that there was no fix for it, and that it had nothing to do with the fact than Mark and I have celiac disease.

And yet, here’s a study. I could have told you the results.

This has been my life for the past four years.

And now, Sander’s healthy and happy. 

But how many kids out there can’t talk or still have symptoms of autism because they were told a gluten-free diet can’t help?

 

Newswise — A landmark study conducted by Children's Hospital & Research Center Oakland is the first to reveal a new syndrome in children that presents with a combination of allergy, apraxia and malabsorption. Autism spectrum disorders were variably present. Verbal apraxia has until now been understood to be a neurologically based speech disorder, although hints of other neurological soft signs have been described. The new study, led by Children's Hospital & Research Center Oakland scientist and pediatric emergency medicine physician, Claudia Morris, MD, and Marilyn C. Agin, MD, a neurodevelopmental pediatrician at Saint Vincent Medical Center in New York, however, suggests that the symptoms of verbal apraxia are, at least for a sub-group of children, part of a larger, multifactorial, neurologic syndrome involving food allergies/gluten-sensitivity and nutritional malabsorption.

 

"While it is critical to treat verbal apraxia symptoms that often include severe delays in expressive speech production with speech therapy, we need to start asking why these kids are having these problems in the first place so that we can identify mechanisms we can actually target to treat the cause of the symptoms," says Dr. Morris.

 

Published in the July/August issue of Alternative Therapies in Health and Medicine, the new study takes a major step toward identifying the potential mechanisms that may contribute to apraxia symptoms. In the study, Dr. Morris collected information from nearly 200 families with children who suffered from verbal apraxia in order to better characterize the symptoms and metabolic anomalies of a subset of children. The data clearly demonstrated a common cluster of allergy, apraxia and malabsorption, along with low muscle tone, poor coordination and sensory integration abnormalities. In addition, Dr. Morris was able to gather laboratory analyses in 26 of the children, which revealed low carnitine levels, abnormal celiac panels, gluten sensitivity, and vitamin D deficiency among others.

 

All children genetically screened carried an HLA gene associated with gluten sensitivity and celiac disease. "The sample size is still small and should be interpreted with caution," says Dr. Morris. "However this is of particular interest given the recent publication by Eaton and colleagues in the July 6 online edition of Pediatrics demonstrating a greater than 3-fold risk of autism in children born to mothers diagnosed with celiac disease. This brings some credibility to the anecdotal reports of gastrointestinal and behavioral improvements in children with autism spectrum disorders and/or verbal apraxia when eliminating gluten from their diets. Although the implications of these observations remain to be determined, this association and the utility of dietary modifications warrant further investigation, particularly if we can identify a genetically vulnerable group".

 

Most significantly, the data indicate that the neurologic dysfunction represented in the syndrome overlaps the symptoms of vitamin E deficiency. While low vitamin E bioavailability may occur due to a variety of different causes, neurological consequences are similar, regardless of the initiating trigger. The study suggests that vitamin E could be used as a safe nutritional intervention that may benefit some children. Growing evidence support the benefits of omega 3 fatty acid supplementation in a number of neurodevelopmental disorders. Anecdotally children with verbal apraxia will often demonstrate leaps in their speech production when taking high-quality fish oil. The addition of vitamin E to omega 3 fatty acid supplementation in this cohort of children induced benefits that exceeded those expected from just speech therapy alone, according to parental report.

 

"While data from a case series is by no means conclusive, the results clearly point to the need for further attention to this poorly understood disorder, and a placebo-controlled study to investigate the potential role of vitamin E and omega 3 supplementation in this group of children," says Dr. Morris.

 

She points out that it is equally important for children given an apraxia diagnosis to receive a more comprehensive metabolic evaluation than what is current practice. Many of the nutritional deficiencies like low carnitine, zinc and vitamin D are easily treated. By not addressing the nutritional deficiencies, the child will continue to suffer from significant medical consequences of those deficiencies. The first step is to identify and treat the deficiencies. The next step is to try to figure out why they have these deficiencies and a fat malabsorption syndrome in the first place. However, Dr. Morris does advise families to work closely with a physician rather than trying promising but unproven interventions on their own.

 

In the mean time, however, Dr. Morris's study provides the essential foundation for identifying the children who may need these treatments.

 

"By identifying these early red flags of the syndrome, we've provided a way to get these kids treatment at the earliest possible moment. While 75 percent of the time kids identified as late bloomers really are just that, 25 percent of the time there is a true pathologic condition. To miss it is to miss critically valuable time for early intervention. If a child has all these symptoms, chances are they are going to fall into the 25 percent who have a condition that needs further evaluation and treatment."

Saturday
Jun092012

The best meal ideas ever!

 

Sander, Sawyer and a friend. Sander didn't like the friend. Can you tell?

 

Published July 21, 2009

You know, every time I think I’m getting the hang of cooking, I’m knocked on my ass.

This article from The New York Times, which is just a bunch of salad ideas, knocked me out.

Why, oh why, aren’t I eating like this every day?

Why have I ever eaten beans and rice when I can have this:

 

“Cereal for grown-ups: Start with puffed brown rice; toss with chopped tomatoes, scallions, a minced chili, cooked or canned chickpeas and toasted unsweetened coconut. Dress with coconut milk and lime juice.”

 

I had bean soup for dinner last night. Why didn’t I do this:

 

“Cook short-grain white rice in watered-down coconut milk (be careful that it doesn’t burn) and a few cardamom pods. While warm, toss with peas (they can be raw if they’re fresh and tender), chopped cashews or pistachios, a pinch of chili flakes and chopped raw spinach.”

 

Or this:

 

“Sear tuna until rare (for that matter, you could leave it raw) and cut it into small cubes. Toss with shredded jicama or radish and shredded Napa cabbage; season with mirin, soy sauce and cilantro. Avocado and/or wasabi paste are great with this, too.”

 

I thought I was fancy and uber-urban with my walnut-dried-cranberry-feta salad.

Apparently, that’s SO last century.

This is the salad of today:

 

“Grate carrots, toast some sunflower seeds, and toss with blueberries, olive oil, lemon juice and plenty of black pepper. Sweet, sour, crunchy, soft.”

 

Yeah. That’s the New York Times talking.

I’m off to go buy me some modern vegetables.

I had a meatloaf defrosting. Silly, silly me.

Perhaps I’ll buy some arugula. Or maybe some raw spinach.

My kids can eat the meatloaf.

 

The article, because I know you’ll be wanting to read it and eat it, is here:

 

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/22/dining/22mlist.html?pagewanted=1&em

Saturday
Jun092012

Questions I've been asked today

Published June 20, 2009

 

If you were Oliver Wood, and you had to kick one person off the quidditch team, but not Harry, obviously, because he’s famous and people come to see him play, who would you kick off and who would you replace him with?

What is the worst thing in the newspaper?

Would you rather be a cyclop’s eye or Anubis’ guts? Why?

Would you rather be trapped in a car at the bottom of a lake, with a hammer to get out, or be trapped on an ice floe, in a stagecoach, before cell phones were invented?

What’s your favorite character in any book, and what book would you move them to if you could?

What’s the best book you ever read?

What’s your favorite character in Star Wars the Clone Wars?

Why can’t we get another dog?

Why can’t we let our dog have puppies?

Can we get a horse?

What’s the most disturbing thing you ever saw?

What’s your worst fear?

Why does everyone have to die and what would happen if everyone came back to life at once?

What if all people were turned into big rubber balls?

What if we all could breathe under water?

What gives you nightmares?

Which one of us do you love better and why?

Why won’t you tell me what the most disturbing thing you ever saw was? 

Why won’t you tell me what gives you nightmares?

How old do I have to be to have a cell phone? Girlfriend? Video game?

 

Sigh.

My brain hurts.

Saturday
Jun092012

Is biomedical intervention proven?

Originally published March 29, 2009


A lady I know who has a son who’s fighting autism has recently compiled tons and tons of information about whether biomedical interventions in autism is scientifically proven.

 Honestly, this is hard. It’s hard to explain what it is, and why it works, and why your doctor doesn’t know anything about it. So I’m glad she took the time to figure all this out -- I’ve been very lax about keeping records about what I read or where I find information.

 So, here’s what she’s found:

There are over 500 researched white papers published by PhDs and MDs on biomedical intervention. One reason they’re hard to find is because they’re not all listed in one place, and many are protected from distributing because they are in journals which require paid subscriptions.  PubMed is probably the best for finding many of them, but you need a subscription to that as well.

 

Some great authors have compiled hundreds of research articles and summaries of white papers in their books.  Here is my friend’s list which she hands to all "doubting" family members, friends and professionals. 

 

Drs. Edelson and Rimland, Recovering Autistic Children, contains 100+ references

Dr. McCandless, Children with Starving Brains, contains 57 references

Dr. Kenneth Bock, Healing the New Childhood Epidemics (Autism, ADHD, Asthma and Allergies), contains 100+ references

Dr. Bryan Jepson, Changing the Course of Autism, contains 500+ references

David Kirby, Evidence of Harm, contains 436 references

Rev. Lisa Sykes, Sacred Spark, contains 100+ references

 

One of the biggest problems in treating autism is that some children respond to certain treatments and others don’t. That’s why there are so many people who question the treatment. One new theory is that not all children on the spectrum have methylation pathway defects, and therefore not all respond to biomedical intervention therapies targeted toward the repairing the immune system.  However, there is a test that measures the markers in the pathway.   

 

If you’re interested in autism, and in why this treatment works, here are the websites where you can read the papers that explain everything. This is Lisa’s list, but it’s pretty similar to where I started while researching all of this:

 

http://www.autism.com/medical/research/index.htm

http://www.thoughtfulhouse.org/publications.htm

http://www.thoughtfulhouse.org/supporting_research.htm

http://www.autismspeaks.org/science/science_ news/index. php?WT.svl= Top_Nav

http://www.autismcenter.org/research_ publications. aspx

http://www.lymeinducedautism.com/presentations.html

http://www.autism. org/    (search engine for research articles)

http://www.safeminds.org/research/

http://www.autismone.org/download2008.cfm

http://www.generationrescue.org/autism/

 

And I love my friend’s tagline, and wish I thought of it first:

May you be well equipped to answer questions, and remain confident and steadfast in your quest to recover your children!